Airbus A350-1000 (Photo: Mario Caruana / MAviO News).
editor
Last update
Give a coffee
Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.
If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary invite for a cup of coffee.
In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.
If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and/or your comments either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.
Your
Aviation.Direct team

After SAF long-haul flight: Complaint filed with OECD against Virgin and British Airways

Advertising
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Last week, Virgin Atlantic operated the first long-haul flight powered solely by SAF. This was hailed as a great success by the industry, but now there are formal complaints to the OECD against Virgin and competitor British Airways.

With the help of a law firm, the organization “Possible” filed complaints against the two carriers with the OECD. Among other things, it states that the two airlines make misleading statements about reducing carbon dioxide emissions. It would not be apparent to non-experts that carbon dioxide emissions would continue to occur.

British Airways is also accused of emphasizing in its advertising that it is taking many steps towards “net zero emissions” and wants to achieve this goal by 2050. The complainants question this and point out that emissions increased annually from 2016 to 2019 and did not decrease. “Possible” criticizes the fact that the advertising materials do not mention that the goals they have set themselves have not yet been achieved.

When asked, a British Airways media representative countered: “We were the first airline to report on its carbon footprint more than two decades ago and we were the first airline to voluntarily participate in the UK emissions trading system.”

The “Possible” organization is generally critical of the SAF deployment. It is believed that the goal of decarbonized aviation cannot be achieved by switching from fossil fuels to renewable raw materials, because combustion in the engines continues to emit carbon dioxide. A spokeswoman said: “For fuels made from biomass, there is no land available on which biofuels can be grown in sufficient quantities to power aviation without enormously damaging deforestation occurring, which increases emissions and makes biofuels just as bad for the climate as kerosene, if not worse.”

Auch bei Virgin Atlantic teilt man diese Ansicht nicht. „Es gibt zwei Hebel, um kurz- bis mittelfristig sektorinterne Kohlenstoffreduzierungen zu erreichen: die Flotte, die wir betreiben, und der Treibstoff, den wir verbrauchen. Wir fliegen bereits mit einer der jüngsten und effizientesten Flotten über den Atlantik. Über die Flottenerneuerung hinaus bietet SAF eine unmittelbare Möglichkeit, den Kohlenstoffausstoß über den gesamten Lebenszyklus hinweg um bis zu 70 % zu senken, und ist etwas, bei dem wir seit über 15 Jahren Pionierarbeit leisten“, so der Sprecher weiter“, so ein Pressesprecher auf Anfrage.

Advertising

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising