Lufthansa winglet (Photo: Mark König/Unsplash).
editor
Last update
Give a coffee
Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.
If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary invite for a cup of coffee.
In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.
If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and/or your comments either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.
Your
Aviation.Direct team

Court bans Lufthansa from misleading advertising on CO₂ compensation

Advertising
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Cologne Regional Court has prohibited Lufthansa from continuing to use certain advertising claims regarding carbon offsetting for flights. The court found the advertising to be misleading. The lawsuit against the airline was filed by the German Environmental Aid (DUH). The ruling (case number 84 O 29/24 of March 21, 2025) is not yet final.

At the center of the proceedings were advertising statements on Lufthansa's website. The company had advertised that CO₂ emissions could be offset by contributions to climate protection projects. It stated that all projects would either save CO₂ or capture it from the atmosphere in the long term. However, the court found that there was no concrete explanation of how the emissions from a booked flight were actually offset. Furthermore, consumers were given the impression that they could fly climate-neutrally by paying a sum of money – which, according to the court, was demonstrably untrue.

The court also deemed Lufthansa's statements regarding sustainable fuels misleading. According to the ruling, the airline is prohibited from using this form of advertising in the future. German Environmental Aid welcomed the decision as an important victory in the fight against consumer deception. Federal Executive Director Jürgen Resch described the ruling as one of the "clearest and most important" against so-called greenwashing.

Lufthansa was reserved about the court's decision. In a brief statement, the company stated that it acknowledged the ruling and would carefully review it. The airline initially left open any decision regarding further legal action, such as an appeal.

Advertising

2 Comments

  • Anselmo, 26. March 2025 @ 15: 17

    … the “Umwelthilfe” doesn’t seem to want to understand it, but the court unfortunately doesn’t seem to have understood it either:
    The accusation that the CO2 savings from SAF cannot be attributed to the specific flight is simply nonsense: Of course, the SAF is burned on other flights; it's never been a secret. And technically, it's hardly possible to do otherwise. But what matters is the overall balance, and SAF already saves 80% of the CO2.

  • Weispace , 26. March 2025 @ 17: 46

    But the railway is allowed to advertise with green electricity. It can always be seen from an electron whether it is green or brown

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertising