A groundbreaking ruling has now been made in a legal dispute between the German Environmental Aid (DUH) and the Lufthansa subsidiary Eurowings. The Cologne Higher Regional Court confirmed the decision of the lower court that Eurowings' advertising on CO2 compensation was misleading and prohibited the company from continuing to advertise with phrases such as "CO2-neutral travel... offset now and take off". This decision not only has consequences for Eurowings, but could also have far-reaching effects on the advertising practices of the entire Lufthansa Group, which has recently been increasingly relying on compensation offers.
The central problem raised in the proceedings was the wording of the advertising, which gave the impression that the flight's CO2 emissions would be offset before departure. The Higher Regional Court explained that this impression was misleading for many consumers, as they would expect their environmental impact from the flight to be offset immediately. In reality, however, the actual offsetting only takes place at a later date - possibly depending on future forecasts and the availability of climate protection projects.
The court found that Eurowings had not sufficiently indicated in its advertising that the compensation of CO2 emissions could not take place immediately, but only in the future. Customers should have been given more detailed information about the timing and the uncertainties surrounding the compensation. This decision sets an important precedent regarding the transparency of advertising promises in the aviation industry.
The practice of CO2 compensation at Lufthansa
Eurowings is not the only company within the Lufthansa Group that uses CO2 compensation as a marketing strategy. In 2023, the Lufthansa Group had already introduced so-called "Green Fares" on selected routes - flight tickets where the CO2 emissions of the flight are automatically offset by purchasing compensation. Lufthansa had announced this measure as an important step to promote climate protection measures in air transport and reported in spring 2024 that there was increasing interest in these "green" tickets. The airline has already seen a positive response, particularly on routes such as Hamburg-Munich, Zurich-London and Frankfurt-Berlin.
Despite the success of introducing Green Fares and the increasing demand for these tickets, the latest ruling is an unwelcome setback for Lufthansa. The decision that advertising statements on CO2 compensation must be formulated more clearly and precisely could affect the attractiveness of the compensation offers and make it more difficult to expand such programs more widely. Lufthansa had hoped that the trend towards CO2 compensation would continue to grow, but the legal dispute with the DUH and the associated requirements are now casting a shadow on these ambitions.
The Influence of Deutsche Umwelthilfe
The German Environmental Aid, which initiated the proceedings, has repeatedly taken action against companies in recent years that it believes provide misleading or insufficient information on CO2 compensation. The organization has repeatedly criticized the aviation industry for unclear or deceptive marketing practices that leave consumers in the dark about the actual effect of compensation offers. With this legal dispute, the DUH has not only won against Eurowings, but has also once again pointed out the need for more honest and transparent communication.
"It's not just about transparency in advertising, but also about educating consumers," said a DUH spokesperson after the ruling. "People need to know what they are actually buying and what impact their decisions have." In the aviation industry, where CO2 compensation is often used as part of "green" image marketing, this is seen as an important step towards greater clarity and fairness.
Impact on the future of CO2 compensation
The court's decision could have far-reaching consequences for the entire aviation industry. In recent years, a trend has been observed in which more and more airlines are integrating carbon offsets as part of their offerings. Other international airlines have also introduced similar models. The question remains, however, how these programs will need to be designed in the future in order to both meet legal requirements and ensure actual climate protection.
Lufthansa and Eurowings must now adapt their communication strategies and ensure that their advertising statements comply with the requirements of the law. It is likely that the company will have to develop new information materials in the coming months and years that will give passengers a clearer picture of the CO2 compensation process and the uncertainties associated with it.
The ruling by the Cologne Higher Regional Court against Eurowings represents an important turning point in the area of CO2 compensation in the aviation industry. It shows how critical the legal framework is for advertising climate protection measures and how strongly companies are held accountable when it comes to transparent and fair communication. The Lufthansa Group will now be forced to adapt its marketing strategies to meet the legal requirements, while Deutsche Umwelthilfe can record another victory in its fight for more transparency and responsibility in the area of climate protection.