Protection from ultraviolet radiation is an essential component of skin care, especially for the face, which is most exposed to the sun. The German Consumer Information Association (VKI) therefore tested 12 sunscreens specifically for the face with a sun protection factor (SPF) of 30 or higher. The results show that almost all tested products provide reliable protection – with one exception. At the same time, the study revealed potential for improvement in other areas.
When evaluating UV protection, the VKI considered both UV-A and UV-B protection. UV-A rays penetrate deeper into the skin and contribute to skin aging and the development of skin cancer. UV-B rays, on the other hand, are the main cause of sunburn and also play a role in the development of cancer. Eleven of the tested products provided reliable protection in both categories.
Only one product failed the test: The "Ultra Sensitive Sun Fluid" from Bipa's own brand "BiCareSun" demonstrated insufficient protection against UV-B rays and was therefore rated "unsatisfactory." However, this is a discontinued model that is hardly available in stores anymore.
Application and skin feel: Good results for all products
In addition to the protective effect, the usability of the creams was also examined. Compared to traditional sunscreens, facial sunscreens often have a lighter texture that absorbs faster and leaves less white residue. According to the test subjects, all tested products performed well in this regard. However, the VKI emphasizes that conventional sunscreens can also be used on the face without any problems – often at a lower price.
Inadequate results in environmental impact
One area where all tested products showed room for improvement was environmental compatibility. Among other things, the tests examined which ingredients they contain and whether these have potentially harmful effects on the environment. They also assessed the sustainability of the packaging material and the extent to which it is recyclable.
On this point, the verdict was consistently poor: Not a single product achieved the top rating; only two sunscreens received an "average" rating, while all others performed worse. Criticisms focused particularly on the use of environmentally harmful ingredients and unnecessary packaging, which increases waste.
Overall results: Protection is guaranteed, environmental aspects need improvement
Overall, ten of the sunscreens tested were rated "good," one product received an "average" rating, and another was rated "unsatisfactory." The most important finding from the test: Anyone looking to protect their face from UV rays has a wide range of reliable products to choose from. However, there is considerable room for improvement in terms of environmental compatibility.
The complete test results will be available from March 27, 2025, in the April issue of the magazine “Konsument” and on the VKI website.
and 