Bremen: ETF Airways wants to sue for damages after a rabbit accident

Bremen: ETF Airways wants to sue for damages after a rabbit accident

Advertising

In August 2021, a rabbit caused the Boeing 737-800 with the registration 9A-LAB to be damaged at Bremen Airport. Now ETF Airways is demanding compensation of around one million euros from the airport.

The company stated, among other things, that the affected Boeing 737-800 could not be used for about a week and had to be equipped with a new CFM56-7B27. The amount of the damage is estimated at around one million euros. They now want to sue for the money at Bremen Airport.

According to his own statements, ETF boss Stjepan Bedic went on an exploration tour in the area of ​​Bremen Airport and claims to have discovered numerous rabbit burrows. The security staff are said to have denied the presence of the animals and turned him away. Subsequently, Bremen Airport is said to have declined liability for the incident.

Now ETF Airways wants to go to court and claim damages. How good or bad the prospects are is unclear, because there are no comparable cases in German judicature. Bremen Airport did not want to comment on the allegations made by the Croatian carrier.

Comment

  • HDietrich, 23. November 2021 @ 16: 31

    They are paying the airport to keep the runway safe. I wonder if the plane crashed, they would refuse the liability as well.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Comment

  • HDietrich, 23. November 2021 @ 16: 31

    They are paying the airport to keep the runway safe. I wonder if the plane crashed, they would refuse the liability as well.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising