ECDC disgraces government: "Quarantine is ineffective"

The Gurgen PCR test in Vienna is carried out with these utensils (Photo: Jan Gruber).
The Gurgen PCR test in Vienna is carried out with these utensils (Photo: Jan Gruber).

ECDC disgraces government: "Quarantine is ineffective"

The Gurgen PCR test in Vienna is carried out with these utensils (Photo: Jan Gruber).
Advertising

Contrary to all appeals from the travel industry, but also from the Robert Koch Institute, Germany introduced compulsory quarantine at the beginning of November. Austria is now following suit and government members Sebastian Kurz and Karl Nehammer, both ÖVP, justify this with discriminatory arguments without citing scientific evidence. The accusation of racism is at least not entirely unfounded, because people with families in the Balkans or in Turkey were presented in public as scapegoats.

Kurz had to admit to Armin Wolf live that the allegations that Nehammer and Kurz made in their government press conference, but also of the Federal Chancellor in an interview with ZIB 2, were not true. As a head of government, you can't really embarrass yourself any more, because the planned regulation is not only a slap in the face for people working in Austria who have families abroad, but also affects your own citizens who work abroad, but also the family lives in the home.

According to the current state of information, Kurz, Anschober, Nehammer and their allies only want to apply the "Anti-Christmas Ordinance" until January 10, 2021. If no new ideas follow, the negative PCR test will be sufficient again from January 11, 2021. If you come from countries without the highest travel warning levels, you don't even need that anymore. In other words: You are at risk until January 10th, 2021, and no longer as of January 11th, 2021. A logic that simply cannot be explained with common sense.

This is exactly how the disease protection authority of the European Union sees it, because it announced that, in the opinion of their scientists, all quarantine rules are completely superfluous. Intensive research by this renowned institution has shown that air passengers do not pose any additional risk to the pan-European pandemic. In view of the fact that the ECDC is not a filthy private basement laboratory, but an institution with a worldwide reputation, industry associations and airlines are now rightly questioning whether the measures taken by various governments with regard to entry and quarantine regulations are at all proportionate.

In order to give this view the right “flavor”, the ECDC and EASA issued an addendum to the “Aviation Health Protocol”. This has already been published and it can be read unmistakably and clearly that the quarantine regulations and other travel restrictions are not only no longer recommended, but ineffective. Incidentally, they did not say which “experts” Kurz, Nehammer and Anschober refer to in their decision, which could not deviate more blatantly from the recommendation of the ECDC. The existence of the opinion of the European epidemic protection authority was simply withheld from the population.

Air travelers are not scapegoats

The ECDC writes that "imported cases" currently only make up a very small, negligible proportion of the entire infection process and that in all of Europe. This statement is backed up with scientific research and hard facts. But that's not all: According to the ECDC, the frequency of Covid among travelers is demonstrably lower than in the total population in their home country. There are also significantly fewer contact persons. The epidemic protection agency also says that states should stop presenting passengers as "super spreaders" as this is not the case. According to the ECDC, almost all transmissions take place domestically in the private sector.

The European Disease Protection Authority also does not consider it necessary that travelers within the EU plus the United Kingdom have to be systematically tested for corona. Only people who show symptoms should not even be allowed to fly. The ECDC considers quarantine to be ineffective and recommends that it be abolished. Excluded from this are trips to areas with an extremely high risk of infection. Here it is recommended to keep a short quarantine and to carry out a test within this. The European epidemic protection authority does not believe in secretions lasting several weeks.

2 Comments

  • Scrap metal aviators, 4. December 2020 @ 09: 41

    Anything that is said in German is fooling around anyway, it is just imposing on the part of the men and women in politics so that everyone gets into the media nicely.
    You deliberately ruin the economy in order to then present yourself as its savior, it seems to me.

  • Peter, 4. December 2020 @ 12: 55

    With these statements one was recently tied to the stake.
    The PCR test is no good as a test for Corona according to the court ruling in Portugal, the death rate of this “pandemic” is no higher than the annual flu (but we have noticeably few flu deaths - strange), on the mask packaging to be worn it says that it is not protect against viruses, countries such as Japan (which have no lockdowns and no mask requirement) also have no health problems or increased death rates, corona emergency stations are empty worldwide, funeral directors register short-time work, the vaccine manufacturers are relieved of all liability for their Vaccination products exempt.
    etc pp
    It is getting harder every day for even the most timid and most uninformed fellow citizens to maintain their corona fear.
    In my opinion, Corona cannot be a pandemic; there must be other reasons for this globally coordinated approach.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

Jan Gruber has been interested in aviation since his youth and specializes in regional aviation and low-cost carriers at Aviation.Direct.
[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

Jan Gruber has been interested in aviation since his youth and specializes in regional aviation and low-cost carriers at Aviation.Direct.
[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

2 Comments

  • Scrap metal aviators, 4. December 2020 @ 09: 41

    Anything that is said in German is fooling around anyway, it is just imposing on the part of the men and women in politics so that everyone gets into the media nicely.
    You deliberately ruin the economy in order to then present yourself as its savior, it seems to me.

  • Peter, 4. December 2020 @ 12: 55

    With these statements one was recently tied to the stake.
    The PCR test is no good as a test for Corona according to the court ruling in Portugal, the death rate of this “pandemic” is no higher than the annual flu (but we have noticeably few flu deaths - strange), on the mask packaging to be worn it says that it is not protect against viruses, countries such as Japan (which have no lockdowns and no mask requirement) also have no health problems or increased death rates, corona emergency stations are empty worldwide, funeral directors register short-time work, the vaccine manufacturers are relieved of all liability for their Vaccination products exempt.
    etc pp
    It is getting harder every day for even the most timid and most uninformed fellow citizens to maintain their corona fear.
    In my opinion, Corona cannot be a pandemic; there must be other reasons for this globally coordinated approach.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising