Flag of the European Union (Photo: Jan Gruber).
editor
Last update
Give a coffee
Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.
If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary invite for a cup of coffee.
In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.
If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and/or your comments either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.
Your
Aviation.Direct team

ECJ asks airlines to pay: Strikes are part of normal business operations

Advertising

The Air Passenger Rights Ordinance also covers a pilot's strike: If a flight is canceled due to an announced strike by airline employees or is significantly delayed, the customer can be entitled to compensation. 

The European Court of Justice announced today after a judgment. The airline cannot argue that such a strike is an "exceptional circumstance", especially if it complies with applicable law. Rather, the protest action should be qualified as normal business activity, according to the ECJ.

An extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation exists if the events, by their nature or cause, are not part of the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are not actually “controllable”.

A dispute from Scandinavia was pending with the highest judicial body of the EU. A passenger wants an airline compensation of 250 euros because a flight from Malmö to Stockholm scheduled for April 2019 was canceled on the same day due to a pilots strike in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. The competent Swedish court asked the ECJ to interpret the relevant regulation.

In its Opinion, the responsible ECJ Advocate General took the view that a strike organized by trade unions was an exceptional circumstance - Aviation.Direct reported. But: The judges do not have to follow the Advocate General in their judgment and can decide otherwise, as was done in the present case.

Advertising

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed..

Advertising