ECJ: Booking changes made by the airline may be subject to compensation

Airbus A350 (Photo: V1Images.com/Luiz Eduardo).
Airbus A350 (Photo: V1Images.com/Luiz Eduardo).

ECJ: Booking changes made by the airline may be subject to compensation

Airbus A350 (Photo: V1Images.com/Luiz Eduardo).
Advertising

The European Court of Justice had to deal with the question of whether passengers whose flights had already been canceled by the airline in advance still had to appear at the check-in counter or otherwise their right to compensation would be considered forfeited. The Supreme Court ruled that this was not necessary.

The complaining passengers had booked a fifth freedom flight from Frankfurt am Main to Madrid with Latam Airlines. This was at short notice, as the trip was scheduled to take place the next day. Since the online check-in did not work, one of the travelers contacted the carrier's hotline. There he found out that the flight he had booked would not take place and was automatically rebooked to another connection without any further information. Only: This flight would have been carried out on the day of booking. There was also the bad news that if you didn't take the flight, you would be denied boarding on the return flight because you didn't use the outbound flight.

The passengers demanded compensation from Latam Airlines in accordance with the Air Passenger Rights Ordinance. The matter surrounding the return flight was particularly spicy because the travelers were not even present in Madrid. The German court turned to the ECJ with the question of whether there was an obligation to pay because the return flight was “cancelled” more than 14 days in advance and the passengers did not even show up at the check-in counter.

This decided that Latam Airlines was liable to pay, regardless of the fact that the refusal of carriage was communicated outside the 14-day period. In the specific case, all the circumstances matter, because the short-term and unannounced rebooking of the outbound flight would have been a decisive factor in the fact that the contract of carriage was not fulfilled in accordance with the contract.

In court, Latam Airlines tried to argue regarding the return flight that passengers who want to make claims must be present at check-in. The ECJ made it clear that this is not provided for in the Air Passenger Rights Regulation. In addition, this would be absurd, because the airline had announced that boarding on the booked return flight would be refused because the outward flight, which Latam had unreasonably brought forward on his own initiative on the day of booking, was not or could not be taken.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

René Steuer is an editor at Aviation.Direct and specializes in tourism and regional aviation. Before that, he worked for AviationNetOnline (formerly Austrian Aviation Net), among others.
[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

René Steuer is an editor at Aviation.Direct and specializes in tourism and regional aviation. Before that, he worked for AviationNetOnline (formerly Austrian Aviation Net), among others.
[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising