Ryanair demands immediate repayment of AUA state aid

Ryanair and Austrian Airlines in Vienna (Photo: Robert Spohr).
Ryanair and Austrian Airlines in Vienna (Photo: Robert Spohr).

Ryanair demands immediate repayment of AUA state aid

Ryanair and Austrian Airlines in Vienna (Photo: Robert Spohr).
Advertising

A few days ago, Austrian Airlines announced that the government-secured loan that was granted in the wake of the corona pandemic will be repaid early. This has now lured the competitor Ryanair out of the reserve. In a media release, he taunts AUA and accuses them of drastically increasing prices.

The low-cost airline is also alluding to a current advertising campaign, because the Austrian airline is currently advertising with "Thank you Austria" and a 25 percent discount on selected routes. In this context, Ryanair is demanding that Austrian Airlines “repay the state aid immediately” and “also reduce its very high fares on the recently announced new routes”.

“While Ryanair continues to invest in and expand operations in Vienna without receiving a single euro in state aid, Austrian Airlines only survived the pandemic thanks to €600 million in state aid from the Austrian government and its German parent company Lufthansa . Despite this aid, Austrian Airlines has continued to cut jobs, cancel routes and further increase its already high fares. Recently, Austrian Airlines announced that it would repay the state aid to the Austrian government “early”, but not before the end of 2022. If Austrian Airlines is serious about saying thank you to Austrian taxpayers, then it should return these funds immediately, next week or at the latest at the end of November to the Austrian taxpayers,” said the low-cost airline in a press release.

Furthermore, Ryanair points out that the new additions announced last week are already being served by the low-cost airline. It is claimed that the low-cost airline would serve them more frequently and have lower fares. “On the Vienna-Porto route, for example, Ryanair offers six weekly flights with prices starting at €24,99, while Austrian Airlines offers only three flights, but their prices start at over €75, more than three times the low Ryanair tariffs”, according to the Irish low coster.

"If Austrian Airlines, the Lufthansa subsidiary, were serious about saying 'Thank you Austria', they would offer Austrian residents and visitors the same low fares as Ryanair. Unfortunately, Austrian Airlines, a subsidiary of Lufthansa, only survived the pandemic thanks to €600m in state aid from beleaguered Austrian taxpayers and German parent company Lufthansa. Austrian Airlines is rewarding these taxpayers by opening five new routes in S23, all served at a lower frequency and at more than three times the price of Ryanair. The Austrian residents and visitors don't need such expensive “thank yous” from Lufthansa Group, they need lower fares and more competitive prices. Ryanair continues to grow strongly in Vienna because we are the only airline in Austria that offers low fares, high frequencies and on-time flights. Vienna residents and visitors can continue to enjoy Ryanair's low fares in Vienna without paying a single euro in Austrian subsidies. Lufthansa offers high fares with high Austrian subsidies, Ryanair offers low fares with no subsidies. Next summer Ryanair will offer 76 routes to/from Vienna, with 19 based aircraft, and all these routes will guarantee lower prices and more punctual flights than Lufthansa subsidiary Austrian Airlines. The future of Austrian air traffic and tourism lies with Ryanair, not with the state-subsidized Lufthansa subsidiaries," explains Andreas Gruber for Ryanair.

Comment

  • Wolfgang Ludwig, 16. November 2022 @ 17: 02

    Dear Ryanair,
    I have read your almost pathological accusations against Austrian Airlines and your strange concern for Austrian taxpayers and I would like to inform you that there are also passenger groups for whom price is not necessarily the most important criterion.

    You give the example of postage (which I'm also interested in next spring) and advertise a price of 24,99 (one way). Apart from the fact that it is immoral to board a plane at such a price anyway, you should also mention that this is a price without luggage – unacceptable for a week's holiday in Portugal anyway.
    If you now compare higher price categories (e.g. Eco flex at Austrian) with your flex additional payments ("plus" for luggage and "Flexi" for rebookings), the result is:
    Austrian (4.-15.4.): €319 in Ecoflex (all prices 16.11.)
    Ryan (however, March 5th-12.3th, since April cannot be booked): €288 (with the additional services mentioned)
    So the difference is a ridiculous €31

    But there are other differences for the 31€ additional costs: With OS I don't have to get up so early when departing Vienna (OS from 10.20am, Ryan from 07.05am).
    I have the opportunity to upgrade to Business at OS, the catering at OS is worlds better than yours, the seats are more comfortable and I don't constantly get bombarded with advertising.

    At OS the holidays start with departure, with Ryan only hours after because you have to recover from the flight...

    So I'm afraid, dear Ryanair, we won't get together any time soon - and the longer you rant against others, the less your sympathy ratings will increase.

    Best regards,
    Wolfgang

    PS: Another quick question as a concerned Austrian taxpayer: Isn't your Lauda Europe, which operates the Porto route, not a Maltese company that also pays taxes in Malta?
    Or am I misinformed?
    ……

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Comment

  • Wolfgang Ludwig, 16. November 2022 @ 17: 02

    Dear Ryanair,
    I have read your almost pathological accusations against Austrian Airlines and your strange concern for Austrian taxpayers and I would like to inform you that there are also passenger groups for whom price is not necessarily the most important criterion.

    You give the example of postage (which I'm also interested in next spring) and advertise a price of 24,99 (one way). Apart from the fact that it is immoral to board a plane at such a price anyway, you should also mention that this is a price without luggage – unacceptable for a week's holiday in Portugal anyway.
    If you now compare higher price categories (e.g. Eco flex at Austrian) with your flex additional payments ("plus" for luggage and "Flexi" for rebookings), the result is:
    Austrian (4.-15.4.): €319 in Ecoflex (all prices 16.11.)
    Ryan (however, March 5th-12.3th, since April cannot be booked): €288 (with the additional services mentioned)
    So the difference is a ridiculous €31

    But there are other differences for the 31€ additional costs: With OS I don't have to get up so early when departing Vienna (OS from 10.20am, Ryan from 07.05am).
    I have the opportunity to upgrade to Business at OS, the catering at OS is worlds better than yours, the seats are more comfortable and I don't constantly get bombarded with advertising.

    At OS the holidays start with departure, with Ryan only hours after because you have to recover from the flight...

    So I'm afraid, dear Ryanair, we won't get together any time soon - and the longer you rant against others, the less your sympathy ratings will increase.

    Best regards,
    Wolfgang

    PS: Another quick question as a concerned Austrian taxpayer: Isn't your Lauda Europe, which operates the Porto route, not a Maltese company that also pays taxes in Malta?
    Or am I misinformed?
    ……

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising